In this episode Stu, Chas and Mel apply the Landmark–Hidden–Secret framework (from DZ-126) across two very different genres: the thriller SIDE EFFECTS (2013) and the tragicomic pilot of SHRINKING.
SIDE EFFECTS is a film of two genres. The first half plays as a drama about depression and over-medication; the second half is a 90s thriller. We talk about how every time Dr Jonathan Banks uncovers a new piece of information, it puts him in danger — and that danger motivates him to uncover more.
In SHRINKING, we see a different use of the framework. “What are psychologists but detectives of the mind?” Rather than the cost of finding secrets, it’s about the cost of sharing them. Chas also comes out of this with a paradigm he’s been building toward (but we’re keeping what that is secret until you listen!)
And inevitably we go on some tangents: whether SIDE EFFECTS should even have been an erotic thriller!
Thanks to our Patrons, especially Khrob, Theis, Sandra, Jesse, Randy, Paulo, Thomas, Jennifer, Malay, Alexandre and Lily.
Narrative POV Over Character POV
"After now looking at four genres across three shows, my key learning is that writers will use narrative point of view, i.e. the audience's relationship to secrets and clues, way more than they use the characters' relationships to those same secrets and clues."
— Chas Fisher
(00:04:29)
· Landmark Hidden Secret
Truth and Power
"When a character says something that's actually true, they lose power. [...] When these characters are saying things, they're not revealing a secret per se -- what they're doing is actually acknowledging that they're aware of it. And by doing that, every time that they do that, they relinquish power."
— Chas Fisher
(01:09:19)
· Subtext
More Draft Zero is brought to you by our awesome Patreons.
If you enjoy the show, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts, a rating on Spotify, or a review on Podchaser.
We are @stuwillis, @mehlsbells and @chasffisher on Twitter. You can find @draft_zero and @_shotzero on Instagram and Twitter.